HyperAudit Research

100% had issues.

We audited 20 real smart contracts across four chains. Every single one had security vulnerabilities. 60% had critical findings that could drain every dollar.

361 findings. 26 critical. Average risk score: 66/100 (B grade).

20
Contracts Audited
361
Total Findings
60%
Had Critical Issues
B
Average Grade

Severity Breakdown

361 findings classified by impact. Nearly a quarter are Critical or High — direct paths to fund loss.

17.2%
22.2%
33.2%
20.2%
26
Critical
7.2%
62
High
17.2%
80
Medium
22.2%
120
Low
33.2%
73
Info
20.2%

How Safe Are Smart Contracts?

We scored each contract 0–100 based on how likely it is to lose user funds. Only 5 of 20 passed. Here is what each grade means for your money.

A80–100
Production-ready

No critical flaws. Safe to deploy with standard monitoring.

5of 20
B60–79
Needs fixes before launch

Exploitable under specific conditions. Owners hold too much power.

10of 20
C40–59
Serious risk to user funds

Multiple paths to fund loss. Would not pass a manual audit.

3of 20
D0–39
Do not interact

Active drain mechanisms. Users will lose everything.

2of 20

Grade D — Do Not Interact

EthereumToken C
20
6 critical6 high
EthereumDEX Protocol
37
1 critical6 high

Grade C — Serious Risk

EthereumToken B
40
3 critical7 high
EthereumToken E
40
2 critical6 high
EthereumToken F
50
4 critical4 high

Grade B — Needs Fixes

EthereumToken G
62
1 critical2 high
BSCToken D
63
1 critical4 high
ArbitrumDeFi Lending
64
4 high
EthereumToken A
68
2 critical4 high
EthereumToken H
69
3 high
ArbitrumYield Vault
72
3 high
BaseToken K
72
1 critical2 high
EthereumToken I
73
3 critical1 high
BaseToken L
77
1 critical1 high
BSCToken M
78
4 high

Grade A — Production-Ready

BaseToken J
81
1 critical3 high
BaseDeFi Protocol
83
no critical
BaseAI Platform
84
1 high
BaseDev Tools
90
no critical
ArbitrumStaking Protocol
91
1 high

75% scored below 80. Only 5 contracts were safe to deploy.

Names are anonymized. All contracts were live on mainnet at the time of audit.

How People Lose Money

The six most common attack patterns we found — in plain language. These are not theoretical. They are deployed on mainnet right now.

🔓

Rug Pull Mechanisms

60%

The owner can withdraw all funds from the contract at any time, in a single transaction.

🪤

Honeypot Traps

30%

Users can buy the token freely, but the contract blocks all sells. You get in — you cannot get out.

💸

Confiscatory Fees

40%

The owner can raise buy/sell fees to 99-100% after launch, taking everything from every transaction.

⚡

No Safety Delays

70%

Critical parameters can be changed instantly — no timelock, no warning, no chance to exit.

🔑

Single Key Control

80%

One wallet controls the entire contract. One compromised key = total loss for all holders.

🥪

Slippage Exploits

50%

Automated swaps execute with zero price protection, letting bots steal value from every trade.

By Chain

Security issues exist across every chain we tested.

Ethereum
Contracts9
Avg Risk51/100
Findings204
BSC
Contracts2
Avg Risk71/100
Findings27
Base
Contracts6
Avg Risk81/100
Findings91
Arbitrum
Contracts3
Avg Risk76/100
Findings39

What a Secure Contract Looks Like

2 of 20 contracts had no Critical or High findings. Here is what they had in common.

Hard-coded fee caps the owner cannot exceed
Timelocks on all admin functions (24-48h delay)
Multisig ownership requiring multiple approvals
Slippage protection on all automated swaps
Role-based access control with separation of duties
No hidden mint or unconstrained supply functions

Case Studies

Read detailed, anonymized breakdowns of each contract we audited — what we found, what it means, and what the project should fix.

View All Case Studies

Get Your Smart Contract Audit Report in 24 Hours

Check a token before you buy it. Audit your contract before you launch it. Secure your protocol before you deploy it.

Token Check: minutes. Token Audit: 24 hours. Protocol Audit: 24 hours. Free re-audit included.